MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2245186967 · doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2477487

Detailed Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Based Real-Time Nonlinear Power Transformer Model on FPGA for Electromagnetic Transient Studies

2015· article· en· W2245186967 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiadai Liu, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransformerElectronic engineeringEddy currentNonlinear systemField-programmable gate arrayFinite element methodEmulationEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltagePhysicsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A detailed power transformer electromagnetic transient model would help in accurately predicting transient stresses and formulating adequate protection strategies in power systems. This paper presents a real-time nonlinear high-resolution magnetic equivalent circuit (HR-MEC) based transformer model on the field-programmable gate array for hardware-in-the-loop simulation. This model is inspired by the mesh generated in finite-element method (FEM) tools to depict the major flux paths in the transformer. All of the major nonlinear phenomena such as saturation, hysteresis, and eddy currents are captured in the transformer hardware emulation whose modules were developed in a 32-b floating point precision VHDL. The developed HR-MEC model and nonlinear numerical solution have been fully parallelized in hardware to achieve the lowest latency in the real-time implementation. The hysteresis in the transformer core is modeled using Preisach theory, and eddy currents are incorporated using a frequency-dependent network. The real-time results are validated using 3-D FEM analysis in JMAG software.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207