MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2245417673 · doi:10.1093/pch/20.7.343

Let’s not forget about injury

2015· article· en· W2245417673 on OpenAlexaffabout
Suzanne Beno, Daniel Rosenfield, Louis Hugo Francescutti

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInjury Epidemiology and Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Injury is a deadly epidemic. It is both the leading cause of death for Canadian children, and the number one killer of Canadians <45 years of age (1). It is also costly – the SMARTRISK report from 2009 (based on 2004 data) outlined the annual economic burden of injury in Canada to be approximately $20 billion, higher than both heart disease ($18.5 billion) and cancer ($14.2 billion). Regardless, Canadians only contributed $6.6 million to injury organizations (eg, War Amps), while contributions to heart disease (eg, Heart and Stroke Foundation) and cancer (eg, Canadian Cancer Society) were $178 million and $203.5 million, respectively (2). Additionally, the release of the 2015 “Cost of Injury in Canada Report” stated there are now >15,000 deaths, 230,000 hospitalizations, 3,500,000 emergency department visits and 60,000 permanent disabilities occurring from this preventable disease every year. The economic cost of injury in Canada has increased by 35% since 2004 (3). A significant proportion of these injuries occur in the paediatric age group. The mortality statistics alone are equivalent to the loss of 13 classrooms of children every year, or a child dying every 9 h (3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0060.011
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0100.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicInjury Epidemiology and Prevention→French-language works237,207→