Capital mega-event and right to the city: a triple dialectic view through the Olympic experiences of Montreal and Rio de Janeiro.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En mobilisant un nombre important de ressources, les Jeux olympiques cristallisent l'espace urbain comme objet de la citoyenneté. Le capital instrumentalise la tension entre identité et altérité associée à l'événement olympique. Celui-ci constitue une structure d'opportunité pour l'expression du droit à la ville, car il sert d'impulsion à un processus de négociation entre les avenirs possibles et de comparaison des expériences olympiques. Le texte aborde la manière dont les acteurs évoluent autour de l'événement olympique en effectuant un exercice comparatif sous-tendu par une triple dialectique où la tendance à l'uniformisation est en tension avec celle de la différenciation. D'abord, cela s'inscrit dans la dynamique du capital contemporain. Ensuite, l'événement olympique est tiraillé entre la répétition cyclique de l'identique et l'affirmation de l'altérité. Finalement, la comparaison vient moduler le champ de la politique urbaine et de l'exercice de la citoyenneté. Nous nous appuyons sur les exemples de Montréal et Rio de Janeiro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".