Tectono-stratigraphic setting of the Moreton’s Harbour Group and its implications for the evolution of the Laurentian margin: Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland<sup>1</sup>This article is one of a series of papers published in this <i>CJES Special Issue: In honour of Ward Neale</i> on the theme of Appalachian and Grenvillian geology.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Moreton’s Harbour Group lies along the Red Indian Line, the fundamental Iapetus suture that separates rocks of peri-Laurentian affinity with rocks of peri-Gondwanan affinity in the Newfoundland Appalachians. Characterization of age and environment of formation of the Moreton’s Harbour Group is an important constraint on evolution of the Laurentian margin during Ordovician closure of Iapetus Ocean and associated marginal basins. The Moreton’s Harbour Group comprises a fault-bounded ophiolitic sequence of layered gabbro, sheeted diabase, pillow basalt, and felsic intrusive rocks. It is offset by high-angle shear zones that were contemporaneous with a 477.4 ± 0.4 Ma syn-tectonic and syn-magmatic suite of trondhjemite and tonalite. Trace element data from the felsic suite indicate formation in a supra-subduction zone setting, although isotopic data from the felsic intrusive rocks (εNd (–5.02) to (–10.53), Tdm 1200–1800 Ma) indicate a significant amount of contamination from Mesoproterozoic or older continental crust. The age and tectonic setting of the Moreton’s Harbour Group suggest that it is the northernmost extent of the ca. 480 Ma Annieopsquotch Ophiolite Belt. We present a model in which the Moreton’s Harbour Group formed in response to propagation of the Annieopsquotch Ophiolite Belt spreading centre into the Dashwoods microcontinent. This ridge propagation model supports the formation of the Annieopsquotch Ophiolite Belt immediately outboard of Dashwoods and explains its rapid accretion to the composite Laurentian margin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".