The corporate social responsibilty movement: a new actor in employment relations?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The defeat of communism as an economic ideology has left capitalism, in all its varieties as the triumphant global economic system. Yet as writers from within the French regulation school have long noted, though capitalism is an efficient and powerful generator of wealth it also has a tendency towards crisis: markets fail, companies externalise costs and social conflict and suffering ensues. In this chapter we critically examine the corporate social responsibility (CSR) movement and explore its capacity to influence employment relations processes at the workplace, corporate and societal levels. We contend that the CSR movement should be admitted as a new actor in employment relations but also acknowledge a number of difficulties and ongoing controversies which will need to be overcome if its influence is to be sustained. Further, the chapter will contend that CSR is an actor that has resonance across national boundaries; it has reach to the transnational operations of global corporations and it has leverage in countries that have limited labour rights and standards. The CSR movement also offers the potential for new coalitions to emerge at the workplace and within national and global employment relations regimes. The analysis begins with a discussion of key theories that underpin the CSR movement. These theories are important in explaining the presence and purchase of the CSR movement. After this, we undertake a detailed exploration of the key drivers and levers of CSR including socially responsible investment and the concomitant codes and reporting systems. Three vignettes from the extractive, building products and footwear sectors are then introduced to demonstrate CSR's capacity to influence employment relations processes and outcomes. Vignettes are typically less comprehensive than full case studies but have the utility of concisely conveying quite complex issues through critical incidents. The vignette approach was used by Murray et al. (2000) in their study of the impact of globalisation in re-regulating labour in the Canadian context. Following these writers, we argue that these vignettes permit 'analytic generalisations' (Yin 1989) of the CSR movement's influence within employment relations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".