MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2245809695 · doi:10.1093/pch/19.2.87

Taking a history with newcomer children and adolescents

2014· article· en· W2245809695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dzung X. Vo

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cultural and language barriers are a major cause of disparities in health care access and health outcomes for immigrant and refugee children and adolescents. To practice culturally effective health care and promote health equity, health care providers need to be aware of their own cultural backgrounds and biases, and sensitive to differences between their own backgrounds and their patients' backgrounds. For newcomer children, adolescents and families, health care providers need to understand immigration history, possible immigration trauma, identity development, acculturation, family conflicts, sociocultural dimensions of health beliefs, experiences with bias or racism, and adolescent risk behaviours and protective factors. All of these issues are influenced by culture, and can profoundly affect health status as well as health care-seeking behaviours and relationships with health care providers. What follows are sample questions that can be gathered in the health and psychosocial history of newcomer children and adolescents. These sample questions are not meant to be exhaustive, nor are they meant to be used as a ‘checklist’ to be asked in a certain order, similar to a structured interview. Rather, these questions illustrate approaches that providers can use to begin exploring issues that significantly affect the health of newcomer children and adolescents (1–6). These questions can be asked of the child and/or parent as appropriate. The issues can be explored directly with the older child or adolescent in a developmentally appropriate manner, including as part of the confidential adolescent psychosocial interview. Cultural competence and culturally effective health care is an important investment in promoting health equity and health, reducing disparities for newcomer children and youth. Please visit the Canadian Paediatric Society's Caring for Kids New to Canada website (www.kidsnewtocanada.ca) for more information and resources on serving this population. What is your country of origin? What ethnic group(s) do you identify with? Why and when did you come to Canada? How did you arrive in this country? What were some of the challenges and difficulties? What or who helped you and your family adjust and cope? Is there anything causing you stress or difficulty? Do you have a support system? Have you made contact with local cultural associations? Do you feel more comfortable being with people of your family's background or mainstream Canadian society, or both or neither? What language(s) do you speak? What language is usually spoken at home? What language do you prefer speaking? Do you ever interpret for your parents? Are you in school yet? How do you like it? How many days do you miss? Have you made friends? Who is your best friend? Where do you play with your friends? What are your hopes for the future? This will help with developing a treatment plan. What do you think has caused this problem? What do you call it? How do you understand it? How does it affect your life? Have you had this problem before? How was it treated before? What do you believe will cure it? Are there any healing practices or medicines that are traditional for your family that you think may help? Is there anything that may help you to feel better that doctors may not know about? Who helps you to handle health issues? What do you fear most about this problem? Are you afraid of being excluded from your own community because of this problem? (eg, tuberculosis or a congenital abnormality) Is there anything else you want to tell me about this situation, or your family or culture that will help me provide you with better care? Ask about these experiences as part of the social history, validate them, and provide appropriate counselling or referrals to mental health and community agencies. Some other children (young people) with the same background have told me about being teased, bullied or harassed just because of their background or the way they look. Has that ever happened to you? Screen all adolescents equally for risky behaviours such as sexual activity or substance use. Never assume that adolescents from a particular cultural group are more or less likely to adopt a behaviour than someone from another group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicMigration, Health and Trauma→French-language works237,207→