MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2245861603

The role of First Nations in oil spill prevention, preparedness, response and recovery in British Columbia

2014· article· en· W2245861603 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Konovsky, Bridget Doyle, Pano Skrivanos, Carleen Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicOil Spill Detection and Mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency responsePreparednessOil spillEmergency managementBusinessPolitical scienceEnvironmental healthMedical emergencyEnvironmental scienceMedicineEnvironmental protectionLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The risk of oil spills from existing oil infrastructure and transport presents a threat to aboriginal environmental and cultural values. First Nations can play a significant role in oil spill response to protect those resources. In this presentation, the authors summarize the Tsleil-Waututh Nation’s involvement in this area and provide recommendations for developing capacity and maximizing effectiveness of First Nations’ participation in oil spill prevention, preparedness, response and recovery. Prevention: First Nations should have the opportunity for consultation with provincial and federal regulatory agencies to ensure standards are adopted that reduce to the maximum extent possible the risk of spill incidents within their traditional territories. Preparedness: First Nations can work with response organizations to ensure that important environmental and cultural values, such as archaeological sites, are designated high priority for protection in geographic response plans. First Nations might also develop their own Incident Management policies or procedures to guide their involvement in the Incident Command System during a spill event. These initiatives should be scalable and include the capacity to address worst case scenario spills. Response: First Nations have human resources available for training and employment often in isolated or key areas; reserve land might also available for pre-siting equipment and supplies. First Nations and their local or traditional knowledge also have a key role to play in shoreline assessments, particularly when archaeological or cultural resources are present. Recovery: clean-up standards need to take into account First Nation priorities because of their reliance on local natural resources for sustenance, ceremonial and economic purposes. Standards should also be set high enough to provide net environmental benefit at the end of any recovery period. Developing the capacity for First Nation involvement in oil spill response as described in this presentation will require financial support from industry or government. Such support will provide for a more robust, effective system for oil spill prevention, preparedness, response and recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicOil Spill Detection and MitigationFrench-language works237,207