Вплив авторської програми застосування омега-3 на стан енергозабезпечувальних систем м’язової діяльності бігунів на короткі дистанції
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Проведено дослідження фізичної працездатності бігунів на короткі дистанції протягом макроциклу підготовки. Установлено особливості прояву окремих компонентів спеціальної фізичної працездатності за Квебекським 10-секундним тестом і тестом Уінгейта та загальної працездатності за тестом PWC170. З’ясовано вищі показники функціональних можливостей систем енергозабезпечення легкоатлетів-спринтерів у підготовчому періоді, які тренувались із використанням авторської програми застосування ПНЖК Омега-3. Виявлено також вищий рівень функціонального стану бігунів-спринтерів у змагальному періоді, які використовували авторську програму. Physical capacity of sprinter-runners within macrocycle training was studied. Considered the peculiarities of manifestation of individual components of special physical performance by Quebec 10-second test, Wingate test and overall performance on a test PWC170. Found higher rates of energy supply systems functionality athlete-sprinters in the preparatory period, which trained with using author’s programme application PUFA Omega-3. Also there were found higher levels of functional state during the competitive period runners-sprinters who used the author’s program.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.100 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".