MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical and pathological correlations in male breast cancer (MBC): Intratumoral aromatase expression (ITA) via tissue microarray (TMA)

2006· article· en· W2245926507 on OpenAlexaffabout
Samantha Gray, Kelly Dakin-Haché, Penny J. Barnes, Ron Dewar, T. Younis, Daniel Rayson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMale Breast Health Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAromataseBreast cancerImmunohistochemistryTissue microarrayPathologyInternal medicineCancerOncologyStage (stratigraphy)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10553 Background: Most cases of MBC are hormone-receptor (HR) positive and there is anecdotal evidence of disease response to aromatase inhibitors in the metastatic setting. Study objectives were to (i) assess clinical-pathologic characteristics in a cohort of MBC, (ii) evaluate intratumoral aromatase expression and (iii) assess its’ prognostic impact. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all cases of MBC seen at the Nova Scotia Cancer Centre between 1985–2005. Data abstracted included disease stage, tumor grade, HR status (ER/PR), HER2-neu and ITA expression as well as dates of disease recurrence and death. Tumor blocks were incorporated into 3 TMA’s with control specimens (gynecomastia, benign breast tissue, liver). Four 1.0 mm cores were taken of each tumor. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with the following antibodies; 6F11 ER primary Ab (Ventana, USA), 1A6 PR primary Ab (Ventana, USA), TAB250 monoclonal mouse anti-HER2 (Zymed, USA), DAKO 0185 rabbit anti-human c-erbB2 (DAKO, Canada), mouse anti-human p450 aromatase Ab (Cedarlane, Canada). ITA staining intensity and distribution was compared to benign hepatic tissue and if > or = to liver was called ’strong’ while < liver was called ’weak’. The log-rank test was used for survival comparisons. Kaplan-Meyer curves were used to estimate 5year disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival probabilities. Results: 54 cases were identified with median age at diagnosis of 64 (31–85 yrs). Median tumor size was 2.6 cms (0.9–8cms) and 22 (41%) had nodal metastases. 45 cases had tissue available for IHC. Of these, 40 (89%) were ER and 33 (73%) were PR positive. HER2-neu was overexpressed in 4/42 (9.5%) and 12/45 (27%) had strong ITA expression. 5 yr DFS was 71% and OS was 64%. In univariate analysis strong (vs weak) ITA expression was associated with improved 5 yr OS (92% vs 49%, p = 0.038) but not DFS (82% vs 76%, p = 0.44) rates. Conclusion: The suggestion of improved OS but not DFS for those tumors with strong ITA expression may imply that these were more responsive to hormonal therapy in the metastatic setting or had a more indolent pace of progression. It is suggested that further investigation of ITA and response to hormonal therapy in MBC is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMale Breast Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207