MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2246094575 · doi:10.4271/2002-01-2762

Development Solutions to a Cleaner, Quieter, Two-Stroke Snowmobile

2002· article· en· W2246094575 on OpenAlexaff
Chris Boutilier, Andrew Davidson, Marcel Derks, Keith Flynn, Bryan Horne, Matthew Irvine, Mike Kuntz, Alex Lothian, D. E. Olsen, Tim van Driel, Roydon Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTwo-stroke engineAutomotive engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the design strategy used by the University of Waterloo's Team Eco-Snow to modify a stock snowmobile in order to compete in the Clean Snowmobile Challenge for 2002. A two-stroke snowmobile is modified to operate more cleanly, quietly, and without sacrificing performance. Excessive noise emissions were Team Eco-Snow's major concern. Noise reductions between 9 and 16 dBA are achieved. Drivetrain and engine efficiency are improved through reduced track frictional drag losses, reduced peak operating engine speed, increased compression ratio, and port modifications that redirect tumble and enhance swirl. Emissions are primarily reduced through an air-assisted catalytic converter system coupled with leaner carburetor settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207