MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W224620427 · doi:10.3138/jcs.35.3.138

"High Octane Kung Fu Action": Examining Racialization in The 2nd Toronto Reel Asian International Film Festival and Fantasia '98: Toronto Festival

2000· article· en· W224620427 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Gender, and Advertising
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacializationReelSociologySubjectivityGender studiesReification (Marxism)AnthropologyEthnic groupRace (biology)Media studiesHumanitiesArtPoliticsVisual artsPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 2nd Toronto Reel Asian International Film Festival and Fantasia '98: Toronto Festival as spaces that produce racialization. This essay examines how these festivals operate through reified notions of "Asian" ethnicity and race; a reification that obscures the understanding that "race" and "ethnicity" are both socio-cultural constructions. Using a Foucauldian notion of subjection, or subject formation, this essay shows that these festivals seldom involve themselves in a self-reflexive critique of how or why an "Asian" subjectivity is constituted. The author argues that racialization becomes veiled and aestheticized as it is used to organize the "Asian" film festival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingFrench-language works237,207