Особливості психоневрологічних розладів у хворих із часто рецидивуючою виразковою хворобою дванадцятипалої кишки
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the study was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the psychoneurological status, in particular depression and anxiety disorders, the level of social maladjustment, alexithymia in patients with relapsed duodenal ulcer (DU). We examined 25 patients with duodenal ulcer in age from 21 to 55 years, who underwent inpatient treatment on the basis of gastroen-terology department of the regional clinical hospital, and 15 healthy individuals who meet clinical group''s age composition. The diagnosis of DU was made according to standardized protocols of diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the digestive system in accordance with the order of Ministry of Healthcare of Ukraine № 271 dated 13.06.2005. To assess the psychoneurological status we used Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, which were filled by clinical interview To determine the presence of stress life events in the morphogenesis of peptic ulcer we used T Holmes R. Rahe comparative scale of social adaptation in modification of Marx et al. (1975). Calculation of integral indicators of social maladjustment has been carried out using scores of stress load of a life event. By indicators of social maladjustment in more than half of the surveyed patients with DU the level of stress resistance to maladjustment factors assessed as low (378.0 ± 34.8) points. In patients with recurrent duodenal ulcer the level of alexithymia was (53.7 ± 0.3) points (p < 0.05), personality type has been characterized as alexithymic one.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".