MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2246545651 · doi:10.2118/174402-ms

Half-Century of Heavy Oil Polymer Flooding from Laboratory Core Floods to Pilot Tests and Field Applications

2015· article· en· W2246545651 on OpenAlex
Hadi Saboorian‐Jooybari, Morteza Dejam, Zhangxin Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canada Heavy Oil Technical Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryEnvironmental scienceOil reservesFlooding (psychology)Oil in placeFossil fuelOil fieldOil productionPetroleumGeologyEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reservoir development is increasingly moving towards the heavy oil resources due to the rapid decline in conventional oil reserves. With the production of conventional low gravity crude oil being surpassed by heavy oil production in Alberta, the vast fields of heavy oil have been considered an emerging source of energy to the growing demands for oil and gas. Although the applications of thermal methods have been successful in many enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects, they are usually uneconomic or impractical in deep and thin pay zones reservoirs. Therefore, polymer flooding is a preferred EOR technique in such reservoirs. An application of polymer flooding in heavy oil reservoirs dates back to more than half a century ago. However, it has long been considered a suitable method for reservoirs with viscosities up to 100 centipoises only. Recently, this EOR technique has attracted great attentions and become a promising method for oil recovery from heavy oil reservoirs with viscosities ranging from several hundreds to several thousands of centipoises. The main reasons for such a widespread application of the technique in heavy oil reservoirs during the last two decades have been rises in oil prices, extensive use of horizontal wells and advances in the polymer manufacturing technology. This paper aims to review the advances and technological trends of polymer flooding in heavy oil reservoirs since the 1960s. Upon the review, complete data sets of the laboratory works, pilot tests and field applications are established. The database provides qualitative description and quantitative statistics regarding both scientific research and practical applications. Then suitable ranges of some crucial affecting reservoir properties and polymer characteristics for successful field applications are examined. Finally, new screening criteria are developed specifically for heavy oil reservoirs based on an analysis of the data. The criteria are compared with the previously established ones. The outcome of this paper can be used as guidelines for screening, planning, design and eventually implementation of future projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it