Stable Routing and Unique-Max Coloring on Trees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some of the routing protocols used in telecommunication networks route traffic on a shortest path tree according to configurable integral link weights. One crucial issue for network operators is finding a weight function that ensures a stable routing: when some link fails, traffic whose path does not use that link should not be rerouted. In this paper we improve on several previously best results for finding small stable weights. As a conceptual contribution, we draw a connection between the stable weights problem and the seemingly unrelated unique-max coloring problem. In unique-max coloring, one is given a set of points and a family of subsets of those points called regions. The task is to assign to each region a color represented as an integer such that, for every point, one region containing it has a color strictly larger than the color of any other region containing this point. In our setting, points and regions become edges and paths of the shortest path tree, respectively, and based on this connection, we provide stable weight functions with a maximum weight of O(n log n) in the case of single link failure, where n is the number of vertices in the network. Furthermore, if the root of the shortest path tree is known, we present an algorithm for determining stable weights bounded by $4n$, which is optimal up to constant factors. For the case of an arbitrary number of failures, we show how stable weights bounded by 3[superscript n] n can be obtained. All the results improve on the previously best known bounds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".