MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2246590112 · doi:10.1145/2783702.2783708

New Research Directions in Knowledge Discovery and Allied Spheres

2015· article· en· W2246590112 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsSystems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada)
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsComputer scienceKnowledge extractionData scienceSchema (genetic algorithms)ViewpointsDomain knowledgeRealmPoint (geometry)Information retrievalWorld Wide WebKnowledge managementData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The realm of knowledge discovery extends across several allied spheres today. It encompasses database management areas such as data warehousing and schema versioning; information retrieval areas such as Web semantics and topic detection; and core data mining areas, e.g., knowledge based systems, uncertainty management, and time-series mining. This becomes particularly evident in the topics that Ph.D. students choose for their dissertation. As the grass roots of research, Ph.D. dissertations point out new avenues of research, and provide fresh viewpoints on combinations of known fields. In this article we overview some recently proposed developments in the domain of knowledge discovery and its related spheres. Our article is based on the topics presented at the doctoral workshop of the ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM 2011.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.331
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it