Security and Governance: Foundations for International Stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract : The fifth annual Kingston Conference on International (KCIS), entitled Security and Governance: Foundations for International Security, was held June 21-23, 2010, in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. The conference was organized by the Queen's Centre for International Relations (QCIR), Queen's University's Chair of Defence Management Studies, the Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) of the U.S. Army War College, and the Land Force Doctrine and Training System of the Canadian Forces. It was designed to outline strategies for coping with the threat posed to international stability by fragile, failing, or failed states. The keynote speakers were: Dr. Richard Downie of the Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies (National Defense University); Lieutenant-General Peter Devlin, Chief of Land Staff (Designate) of the Canadian Forces (CF); and Joseph Quesnel of the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. This conference was attended by over 150 government officials, academic experts, think tank members, and U.S. and Canadian military personnel, and included a wide range of presentations that outlined various strategies for identifying and ameliorating the security challenges that result from state failure in contemporary international environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".