Bibliographic record
Abstract
IT1 1 oday on, of F"'nce ', mo" '''p,md and m,amred cci,i" in ,he realm of poetics and aesthetics, but, too, one of her most freespirited and wide-ranging poetical voices, Jean-Claude Pinson offers us here, in Free Jazz, not just a text of memorialisation, recognition and praise of one of the greatest American jazz musicians of all time, but, further, a true insertion of the joy of such a recognition in the life of a young boy and, today, that of a mature philosopher and poet.After the important pseudo break from earlier work that Fado (avec flocons et fantomes) may be said to constitute -I say pseudo, because, clearly, a marked continuity of vision and tone remains perceptible, although the 'break' gives us a sharply renewed lyricism we may not have expected so soon -, Free Jazz boldly pursues a writing of experience at once clear-headed and fanciful, shrugging off inhibitions and preconceptions that might have given pause to other poets, Pinson toying and amusing himself with the 'theatricalities' launched in Fado, pushing to the side even, I should argue, elements of the sobering though resilient poetics sketched out in A quoi bon la poesie?For Free Jazz undoubtedly and wilfully rides on an aesthetics-cum-ethics of upliftment, of aeration, of continued 'experimentation' with the feasibilities not only of form and rhetoric, but, more importantly, those that orient and possibilise the very 'experience' of everday life as we choose to mould and build it into validity, valeur, as Michel Deguy has recently termed it -even though, for the latter, and let us not presume with respect to Pinson, such a valeur may float, at least at times, on the waters of some energie du desespoir.To be sure, there is exhilaration here, high and felt appreciation of self, its options, its past gifts (rethought), appreciation too of the other: David Ryan, James Sacre, Don Cherry, etc., but, also, there is a lightness of manner and treatment that, whilst not undercutting serious reflexion, restores an enthusiasm, a souffle, at once simple and richly refreshing that the heaviness of certain thought can repress, imagining the tragic or the melancholic to be more noble and justifiable in an age deemed all too readily 'unredeemable'.What such discourse might be worth to a child of three or ten does not seem to be relevant to perpetrators of their own dourness; Pinson's 'rushes' and soarings, his chosen naivetes and determination to 'tout reprendre azero, les pieds nus sur le sable', offer such children, as they offer any reader, reasons to live and be passionate, to dream and to assume the innocence of one's 'reenfantement'.'Too flaky, too flip?',Pinson even asks himself... But he is too immersed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".