MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2246756468

Winners, cheats and witches: East African soccer cartoons

2006· article· en· W2246756468 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jigal Beez

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTanzaniaTournamentDreamQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyMiddle EastHistoryPolitical scienceAncient historyAdvertisingMedia studiesGender studiesEthnologySociologyPsychologyArchaeologyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The year 2006 is definitely a soccer year. The soccer world cup is hosted in Germany and five African teams have qualified to participate in this big sports event unfortunately none from East Africa. The East African nations Tanzania, Kenya and Uganda are no soccer powerhouses. The last qualification of the Taifa Stars, the Tanzanian national side, for the African Cup of Nations dates back more than a quarter of a century. At least Kenya’s Harambee Stares qualified for the Africa Cup two years ago. The biggest East African soccer triumph was when Uganda’s Cranes reached the final of this tournament in 1978 and lost to Ghana’s Black Stars. But not even professional optimists or notorious soothsayers dream of an East African team qualifying for the world cup. Nevertheless this region is soccer crazy and an event like the world cup is reflected by East African cartoonists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0390.017
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0070.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSocial Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)Same topicSport and Mega-Event ImpactsFrench-language works237,207