MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2246889609 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2015.2473822

A ZVS Pulsewidth Modulation Full-Bridge Converter With a Low-RMS-Current Resonant Auxiliary Circuit

2015· article· en· W2246889609 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Safaee, Praveen Jain, Alireza Bakhshai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRLC circuitPulse-width modulationCurrent (fluid)Equivalent circuitInductorConvertersVoltageElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Modulation (music)Boost converterComputer scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringCapacitorAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the description and analysis of a phase-shift-modulated full-bridge converter with a novel robust passive low-rms-current resonant auxiliary circuit for zero-voltage switching (ZVS) operation of both the leading and lagging switch legs. Detailed time-domain analysis describes the steady-state behavior of the auxiliary circuit in different operating conditions. An in-depth comparative study between a fully specified baseline converter and the equivalent converter using the proposed resonant auxiliary circuit is presented. For a similar peak auxiliary current to ensure ZVS operation, a minimum of 20% reduction in rms current is obtained, which decreases the conduction losses. Key characteristics and design considerations are also fully discussed. Experimental results from a 750-W prototype confirm the predicted enhancements using the proposed resonant auxiliary circuit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207