MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2246983183

An Assessment of Co-operative Society as a Strategy for Rural Development in Edo State of Nigeria

2015· article· en· W2246983183 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity and Sustainable Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRural developmentGeographyPolitical scienceEconomic growthSocioeconomicsSociologyAgricultureEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main object of this paper is to assess the role of co-operative societies as a development strategy. The study was conducted in Edo State of Nigeria. One hundred and fifty respondents were selected using a convenient sample technique. They were drawn from three local government areas of the State. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data from the respondents. Statistical analysis was accomplished by means of frequency distribution, percentages and Chi square. The result of the analysis showed that the co-operative society strategy is successful and should indeed be encouraged in the development of the rural communities. The study showed that there is a significant relationship between the co-operative society and the growth in size of the rural business in the rural community and that there is also a significant relationship between the growth in the co-operative society and the creation of employment in the rural community. The study may lack generalization due to the small number of co-operatives used for the study and the convenient sample nature of the selected respondents. Keywords: co-operative society; rural development; fisheries; assessment; strategy -------------------------------------------------------------- Resume L'objectif principal de cet article est d'evaluer le role des societes cooperatives comme strategie de developpement. L'etude fut menee dans l'Etat d'Edo au Nigeria. Cent cinquante candidats furent selectionnes a l'aide d'une technique d'echantillonnage simple. Les personnes sondees appartiennent a trois regions gouvernementales locales de l'Etat. Un questionnaire structure fut utilise pour collecter les donnees des repondants. Les analyses statistiques furent realisees grâce a une distribution des frequences, des pourcentages et le chi carre. Le resultat de l'analyse montrent que la strategie de la societe cooperative est un succes et devrait en fait etre encouragee dans le developpement des societes rurales. L'etude montre qu'il y a une relation significative entre la societe cooperative et la croissance en taille de l'entreprise rurale dans la communaute rurale et qu'il y a aussi une relation significative entre la croissance de la societe cooperative et la creation d'emplois dans la communaute rurale. L'etude pourrait manquer de generalisation a cause du faible nombre de cooperatives utilisees pour l'etude ainsi que la nature pratique de l'echantillonnage des personnes selectionnees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it