MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UCBO Hydraulic Oil and Application on Hydraulic Measurement for Laval Nozzle Throat Diameter

2015· article· en· W2246989579 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandrelNozzleHydraulic fluidVolumetric flow rateMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceHydraulic motorHydraulic machineryViscosityDischarge coefficientFlow (mathematics)MechanicsEngineeringComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a hydraulic measurement model for measuring the Laval nozzle throat diameter size. Based on measurement principle of liquid pressure – flowrate, we can get the size of Laval nozzle throat diameter by measuring the fluid flowrate through hydraulic measurement model at the fixed pressure. With good viscosity-temperature performance, low temperature performance and oxidation stability, UCBO aviation hydraulic oil is selected as the measuring medium. In the hydraulic measurement model, the diameter of the mandrel which can be regarded as gauge will directly affect the sensitivity of diameter measurement. Therefore we need to optimize the design of the mandrel of the hydraulic model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it