MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Les enjeux stratégiques de l’Union européenne et de la Turquie dans les Balkans occidentaux

2014· article· fr· W2247147891 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Liridon Lika

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventions économiques · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Communist Economic and Political Transition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceMontenegroEuropean unionHumanitiesArtHistoryEthnologyBusinessInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Turquie n’est pas en mesure à l’heure actuelle d’offrir aux Balkans occidentaux une alternative plus séduisante que celle de l’UE. Les Balkans occidentaux, une notion créée par les institutions de l’Union européenne (UE) à la fin des années 1990, regroupent les pays comme l’Albanie, la Bosnie-Herzégovine, la Croatie (membre de l’UE depuis le 1er juillet 2013), le Kosovo, la Macédoine, le Monténégro et la Serbie. Cette région hétérogène présente des enjeux stratégiques importants tant pour ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterventions économiquesSame topicPost-Communist Economic and Political TransitionFrench-language works237,207