MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Family Business: Critical Commentary on an Established Socio-Spatial Explanatory Concept and the Example of Palestine

2011· article· en· W2247379652 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Peter Lindner

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalestineSettlement (finance)PillarOrder (exchange)PoliticsOrientalismAction (physics)Space (punctuation)SociologyPerspective (graphical)Political economyPolitical scienceEpistemologyEconomyLawBusinessGeographyEconomicsHistoryEngineeringPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the beginning of the peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, the prospects for a political settlement of the conflict have been seen in close connection with the economic situation. The PLO, as well as the donor countries, hoped to see the private sector become the main pillar of the emerging Palestinian economy, generally describing it as dominated by traditional businesses. The first part of this article connects family business—a concept well-established in the Western oriental sciences—to Edward Said's concept of Orientalism. The question is raised: which concept of space and culture supports the orientalist perspective and should consequently be avoided as the basis of the term family business? Taking a de-homogenized, de-essentialized and dynamic concept of space as a starting point, it is argued that companies in Palestine are socially defined as separate action-spaces that are structured by specific sets of norms in order to avoid some of the crucial problems of the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.038
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0200.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207