MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Application of Narrow Band Power Line Communication in Volt/Var Optimization

2014· article· en· W22475921 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Babak Shahabi

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nuclear Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Communications and Noise
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
KeywordsVoltLine (geometry)Power (physics)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringVoltagePhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart grid is an advanced and sophisticated electrical network that uses a combination of information and communication technology to gather required data from different nodes on the network through a reliable, robust and cost effective communication solution, and acts on them to improve the efficiency and reliability of production and distribution of electricity.Volt/Var optimization (VVO) is one of the most important smart grid applications that gives this capability to utility companies to have an efficient electricity distribution network by maintaining an acceptable voltage level along the distribution section under different loading situations.This project focused on characterizing and evaluating the performance of narrow band power line communication (NB-PLC) as a prevalent communication technology for smart grid applications such as VVO in North American power grid.This work was done by establishing and setting up a real test bed in the lab.In this work we tried to implement S-parameter measurements due to its simplicity for channel characterization at high frequency ranges, when we have cascades of different components over the channel.It should be mentioned that the main focus of our work was on analyzing the behavior of an energized 5KVA MV/LV transformer over our channel.Then, we have shown the relationship between S-parameters and ABCD parameters to derive the channel transfer function based on ABCD matrix.Additionally, we did some simple noise measurements over our channel when it was non-energized and energized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Nuclear MedicineSame topicPower Line Communications and NoiseFrench-language works237,207