MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2247764502

An Inside Look at Ice-Crushing Induced Vibration and Lock-In

2011· article· en· W2247764502 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpallSawtooth waveMaterials scienceVibrationLoad cellGeologyOpticsComposite materialAcousticsStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-speed imaging (up to 30,000 images/s) has been used to observe the behavior of pyramidshaped polycrystalline freshwater ice samples during crushing at –10oC in the lab. The ice contact zone consisted of an intact high-pressure central area surrounded by pulverized spall debris and partially refrozen melt. A sawtooth pattern was evident in the load record, similar to that observed in other ice crushing and indentation studies. Spalling behavior was responsible for the sequence of load drops in the sawtooth load pattern and has been discussed before. Here we report details of system vibration associated with spalling. Essentially the spalling events serve as impulses that excite resonant vibration in the ice/apparatus system. We furthermore observed that resonant lock-in occurs when the frequency of the spalling events is in the vicinity of the dominant resonant frequencies of the ice-apparatus system. Correlation of load and actuator displacement data and visual observations of spalling and slight flexures of the thick acrylic crushing platen, through which the ice behavior was observed, enabled the identification of resonant modes and lock-in onset. Lock-in was observed at the two apparent dominant resonances in the apparatus, i.e. roughly 350 Hz and 900 Hz. These resonances appear to be associated with the pump/actuator system (350 Hz) and a flexural resonant mode of the acrylic platen (900 Hz). Spalling frequency was generally higher at the beginning of the crushing tests, when the ice was less confined and more susceptible to fracture, and decreased with increasing confinement as the tests progressed. In tests where the nominal actuator speed was 40 mm/s the higher frequency lock-in mode was briefly observed at first, and a short time later lock-in occurred extensively at the lower frequency. These observations are relevant to resonance and lock-in behavior that has been observed in ice-structure interaction at larger scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207