MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Urinary n-telopeptide (NTX) predicts palliative pain response in metastatic breast cancer patients receiving second-line zoledronic acid

2006· article· en· W2247800806 on OpenAlexaff
George Dranitsaris, Mark Clemons, Wei Ooi, David E.C. Cole

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineZoledronic acidPalliative careBisphosphonateBone painInternal medicineBreast cancerN-terminal telopeptideUrinary systemCancerUrologyOncologySurgeryOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

679 Background: A substantial number of breast cancer patients will have bony progression or develop skeletal related events (SRE) despite treatment with a bisphosphonate (BP) such as clodronate or pamidronate. What could be of use to the practicing oncologist is a marker for predicting which patients will derive palliative benefit with the second-line use of a more potent BP such as zoledronic acid. In this study, we assessed the clinical utility of using early changes in urinary NTX as a predictor of palliative response to second-line zoledronic acid. Methods: 30 patients with either a documented SRE or bony progression while on either clodronate or pamidronate were switched to infusions of zoledronic acid (4 mg) every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. Urinary NTX and worst pain score using the Brief Pain Inventory were evaluated weekly for the first 4 weeks & again at week 8. No change in systemic anti-cancer treatment was allowed in the month before or after commencing study treatment. A palliative response was defined as a reduction of at least two units in the worst pain score. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine if a decrease in urinary NTX at week 1 relative to baseline was a significant predictor of palliative response to zoledronic acid when measured at week 8. Results: At week 1, 23 of 30 (76.7%) had a drop in their urinary NTX excretion relative to baseline. At week 8, these 23 patients experienced a 2.4 unit decline in their worst pain score, compared to only a 0.28 unit reduction in the 7 patients whose week 1 urinary NTX increased relative to baseline (P=0.11). A week 1 drop in urinary NTX was identified as an important predictor for palliative response to zoledronic acid when measured at week 8 (OR=9.4; 95%CI: 2.28 to 79.8, P=0.014). Conclusions: Our findings imply that a decline in urinary NTX at week 1 is a useful marker for identifying which patients will derive palliative benefits from second-line zoledronic acid. Additional data on a larger sample of patients is needed to validate the clinical utility of using early changes in urinary NTX as a rapid predictor of patient benefit. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicBone health and treatments→French-language works237,207→