Equal Families, Equal Parents, Equal Spouses, Equal Marriage: The Case of the Missing Patriarch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Patriarch of Loch Law: A Cautionaty Feminist Fable In the submarine world of pristine Loch Law, some say - notably elders of the feminist family law acaderny, silver haired crones of iny ilk - there thrives a wily resilient relational form - a shadowy figure that swims in the apparently even waters of Loch Law. There are new fresh streams that feed the old Loch. Within living memory, the Loch was fed by other streams, the stream of Pure Patriarchy and its tributaries,Tender Years, Matrimonial Offences, and It's My Farm. Some say that those streams and tributaries were damned and drained, and, now, Loch Law is replenished with the new spring fed waters of Gender Neutrality and Formal Equality. But the feminists say, they see it still, the Patriarch of Loch Law. Its stealth they say is legendary; seldom does its mighty face surface in the Loch. Cloaked like a chameleon in familial ideological form and speaking the discourse of choice and love, the Patriarch of the Loch still makes cameo appearances, staying scarcely long enough to pay, and less ofen to share, when children's shoes need to be purchased, when toilets need to be scrubbed, when groceries need to be purchased, when homework needs to be checked, and when birthday parties need to be prepared. The women in these homes know the Patriarch of Loch Law exists, but they do not speak of it, for their husbands, nay spouses, nay partners are good fathers, nay good parents. The Patriarch of Loch Law is gone, they say, like the dodo, the dinosaur, and the black and white TV that brought us Leave it to Beaver and Father Knows Best. To the feminists, they say, that was then; the Patriarch of Loch Law is a was. But some of us see him still. We say he is not a phantom of a fictionalized feminist legal past. He does not simply haunt our memories and old cases; he shapes and irqluences us still. The Patriarch of Loch Law is chameleon like - sometimes monster, sometimes siren, sometimes phantom. He is poised to welcome a new stream, Equal Marriage, to the Loch. We say, it will take more than feeble law reform and litigation to drive him out. He retains the capacity to be as intrusive as a former lover and as enduring as a child's father. And besides, he has friends in high places, and new rainbow fish to fry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".