MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2248214702

CONDUCTING TELEPHONE ORIGIN-DESTINATION HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS WITH AN INTEGRATED INFORMATIONAL APPROACH

2000· article· en· W2248214702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation research circular · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringTravel surveyTRIPS architectureGeocodingComputer scienceTrip distributionPresentation (obstetrics)Set (abstract data type)PedestrianTravel behaviorGraphicsModalOperations researchData scienceGeographyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the urban transportation planning scene, collecting information on mobility is a costly exercise. Most of the time, it is a multi-institutional, multi-objective and multidisciplinary project. A lot of discussions arise between partisans of a very detailed and extensive questionnaire and promoters of short and sweet, unambiguous questions about trips made the previous day. Quality, quantity, significance, costs and nonresponse bias are legitimate issues that cannot be satisfactorily answered by a single survey method. Topics addressed in the presentation concern the demonstration of a survey method that integrates a set of technological innovations. Typically designed around the Montreal telephone household survey of 1993, the method illustrates the use of several techniques easily adapted to a standardized microcomputer environment: Cascaded questions focused on household, people living in it and trip characteristics of these people; Direct verification and validation of information fields and logical travel sequence (trip chaining); Interactive geocoding of origin and destination locations, with the help of spatially referenced databases, such as street addresses, street intersections, monuments (main trip attractors organized in suitable categories) and postal codes already structured within a specialized transportation geographic information system; and Systematic interactive validation of trip modal components such as bridges, bus routes taken, subway stations, accessibility, multi-modal behavior, etc. Some of the benefits of the method come from the fact that it uses the same integrated tools employed for transit network-planning modeling and user travel-information systems, these latter having been developed according to a totally disaggregate approach. Moreover, interactive graphics methods are used off-line to reconstruct badly obtained information. In conclusion, the paper demonstrates the current technological capability of conducting continuous telephone O-D surveys to monitor urban mobility in a cost-effective manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it