MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2248373025 · doi:10.2134/jeq2014.11.0459

Fecal Contamination in the Surface Waters of a Rural- and an Urban-Source Watershed

2015· article· en· W2248373025 on OpenAlexafffund
Emma C. Stea, Lisbeth Truelstrup Hansen, Rob Jamieson, Christopher K. Yost

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Quality · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFecal contamination and water quality
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Water Network
KeywordsFecal coliformVeterinary medicineFecesWatershedTurbidityWater qualitySalmonellaSurface waterBiologyIndicator bacteriaMicrobiologyEcologyEnvironmental scienceBacteriaEnvironmental engineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface waters are commonly used as source water for drinking water and irrigation. Knowledge of sources of fecal pollution in source watersheds benefits the design of effective source water protection plans. This study analyzed the relationships between enteric pathogens (Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., and Campylobacter spp. [C. jejuni, C. lari and C. coli]), water quality (turbidity, temperature, and E. coli), and human and ruminant–cow Bacteroidales and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)-based fecal source tracking (FST) markers in two source watersheds. Water samples (n = 329) were collected at 10 sites (five in each watershed) over 18 mo. The human Bacteroidales marker (HF183) occurred in 9 to 10% of the water samples at nine sampling sites; while a forested site in the urban watershed tested negative. Ruminant–cow Bacteroidales markers (BacR and CowM2) only appeared in the rural watershed (6%). The mtDNA markers (HcytB and AcytB) showed the same pattern but were less sensitive due to lower fecal concentrations. Higher prevalences (P < 0.05) of Campylobacter spp. (41 vs. 16% for the rural and urban watershed, respectively) and E. coli O157:H7 (12 vs. 3%) were observed in the rural watershed, while Salmonella spp. levels were comparable (23–28%). Densities of E. coli ≥100 colony-forming units (CFU) 100 mL−1 increased the odds (P < 0.05) of detecting the enteric bacterial pathogens. The water turbidity levels (nephelometric turbidity units [NTU] ≥ 1.0) similarly predicted (P < 0.05) pathogen presence. Storm events increased (P < 0.01) pathogen and fecal marker concentrations in the waterways. The employment of multiple FST methods suggested failing onsite wastewater systems contribute to human fecal pollution in both watersheds. Core Ideas Human marker (HF183) detection revealed human fecal contamination in both watersheds. Ruminant markers (BacR and CowM2) only occurred in the rural watershed (6%). The mtDNA markers were less sensitive due to lower initial fecal copy numbers. E. coli ≥100 CFU 100 mL−1 or turbidity ≥1 NTU increased the odds of pathogen presence. Storm events increased detection of pathogens and MST markers in the rural watershed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental QualitySame topicFecal contamination and water qualityFrench-language works237,207