MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W224862179

Principle, method and application of FORECAST model.

2009· article· en· W224862179 on OpenAlexaff
Jie ChengYue, Xin ZanHong, Xin XiaoYing, Jiang Hong, Xiaohua Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueZhejiang Linxueyuan xuebao · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)Forest ecologyVariety (cybernetics)Forest managementComputer scienceEcosystem modelFunction (biology)Environmental resource managementManagement scienceGovernment (linguistics)Ecosystem managementMathematical modelEcosystemEcologyEnvironmental scienceEconomicsArtificial intelligenceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mathematical model is an important tool to help scientists and good government policy makers with planning and forecasting. In recent decades,large number of mathematical models,experience models and models based on the process have emerged,and made tremendous contributions to the development of modern ecology. Model of forest ecosystem processes is a very important forestry model. FORECAST is a model based on the process of forest ecosystems stand level. It can simulate a variety of effects that management strategies impose on forests,predict the development trend of the structure and function of the forest ecosystem and help us formulate appropriate management strategies for forest ecosystems optimizing manage ment services. This article makes a simple introduction to the development of FORECAST model,principles,methods and practical applications,and its strengths and limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.379
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhejiang Linxueyuan xuebaoSame topicForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in ChinaFrench-language works237,207