MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2248784344

A Preliminary Analysis of Molikpaq Local Ice Pressures and Ice Forces at Amauligak I-65

2005· article· en· W2248784344 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Denise Sudom, R. Frederking

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of NewfoundlandTransport Canada
KeywordsGeologyClimatologyArctic ice packIce streamPressure ridgeDrift iceAtmospheric sciencesSea iceCryosphere
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Amauligak I-65 deployment of the Molikpaq for the winter of 1985/86 provides a good source of local pressure data and a basis for estimating global loads on a wide structure. Data including Medof panel pressures and hourly ice conditions at Molikpaq have been extracted from the “Catalogue of Local Ice Pressures” (CLIP) database. Pressures as high as 10 MPa were experienced on small areas; on areas greater than 3 m2, peak pressures are less than 2 MPa. A method is presented for the calculation of peak loads on the north and east faces, using local ice loads to obtain estimates of global face loads. Extreme values of global ice loads were of the order of 200 MN, with most ice forces during the season being much lower. Thicker ice generally corresponds to higher ice loads on both the east and north faces. However for the thickest ice, lower than expected forces were calculated for the faces of the structure. This could be due to less ice drift (and lower exposure) for very thick ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207