2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conference, RE'15, in the beautiful multicultural city of Ottawa, Canada.For almost a quarter of a century now, this Conference has hosted researchers, practitioners, educators and students interested in Requirements Engineering, presenting latest results, technical innovations, reports from field work, emerging challenges and opportunities.In so doing, RE has often opened the way for tool vendors, companies, teaching institutions, and professional bodies looking to anticipate the needs of the booming information society at large.The particular focus of RE'15 is in line with the special role that Requirements Engineering can play in identifying the needs of large population segments, and in effectively processing their input, expressed or implied, and to deliver better products and achieve greater satisfaction to a large number of users.This special focus is distilled in the RE'15 motto of "Requirements for the masses, requirements from the masses."-a theme which several accepted papers have addressed.The conference offers a rich technical program, including a number of selected papers from (and for) both academic and industrial perspectives.Presentations of these papers, grouped by subject, span the entire 3-day duration of the conference.In addition, this year we have introduced a new track named "RE: Next!" that offers shorter previews of ongoing work.This track is an excellent opportunity to hear what people around the world are currently working on, to establish early collaborations, to stimulate ideas and to share experiences while the chances of influencing future development are high, or even to get the first peek at the next big breakthrough!A number of complementary events enrich and complete our program: tutorials, posters, a doctoral symposium, tools & demo highlights, discussion panels, and reports "from the trenches" about the current state of practice.Ten workshops, on Monday and Tuesday, provide excellent opportunities for more focused presentations and discussions.Some of the workshops have long been associated with RE, and we are glad of continuing such a fruitful tradition; others are being held for the first time.To the latter goes our special welcome to the RE family!
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it