MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W224892459 · doi:10.2527/2003.8161517x

Parturition body size and body protein loss during lactation influence performance during lactation and ovarian function at weaning in first-parity sows1

2003· article· en· W224892459 on OpenAlexaff
E. J. Clowes, F. X. AHERNE, A. L. Schaefer, G. R. Foxcroft, Vickie E. Baracos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactationWeaningAnimal scienceBiologyEndocrinologyBody weightLysineLean body massInternal medicineFollicular phaseChemistryPregnancyMedicineBiochemistryAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigated the effect of body protein mass at parturition and different degrees of body protein loss in lactation on sow performance. In a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement, 77 Genex gilts were fed to achieve either a standard or high body mass at parturition and to lose either a moderate (MPL) or high (HPL) amount of protein in lactation. Pregnant gilts were fed either 24.4 MJ of ME, 266 g of CP, and 11 g of lysine/d or 34.0 MJ of ME, 436 g of CP, and 20 g of lysine/d resulting in divergent (P < 0.01) live weights (165 vs. 193 kg) and calculated protein masses (24.3 vs. 30.0 kg) and slightly different backfat depths (20.0 vs. 22.8 mm; P < 0.05) at parturition. Diets fed during lactation were formulated to deliver 731 g of CP and 37 g of lysine/d or 416 g of CP and 22 g of lysine/d to induce differential body protein mobilization. Sows were slaughtered at weaning (d 26), and the weight of the organs and the lean, fat, and bone in five primal cuts was measured. The external diameter of the eight largest follicles on each ovary was recorded, and the follicular fluid from these follicles was collected, weighed, and analyzed for estradiol. Losses in lactational live weight (26 vs. 20 kg; P < 0.01) and calculated protein mass (17.8 vs. 10.7%; P < 0.001) were greater, and the carcass lean mass at weaning was 10% lighter (P < 0.05) in HPL sows. Backfat (5.1 +/- 0.8 mm; P = 0.29) and calculated fat mass (25.8 +/- 1.5%; P = 0.84) losses did not differ between treatments. Both sow body mass (P < 0.05) and lactation protein loss (P < 0.01) affected litter growth rate. Litter growth rate decreased (P < 0.05) at the end of lactation in HPL sows once these sows had lost 10 to 12% of their calculated protein mass. Ovarian follicular development was most advanced in high body mass sows that lost the least protein; these sows had the heaviest (P < 0.05) uterine weight and highest (P < 0.05) follicular fluid estradiol concentration. Follicular development was least advanced in standard body mass sows that lost the most protein. These sows had the lowest (P < 0.05) muscle:bone ratio at weaning and likely lost the largest proportion of their muscle mass compared with the other treatments. In conclusion, ovarian function at weaning and litter performance was higher in high body mass sows and in sows that lost the least protein in lactation, suggesting that a larger lean mass may delay the onset of a decrease in performance in sows that lose protein in lactation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207