Frequency and correlates in young adult Quebec francophones' experiences of sexual harassment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the frequency of sexual harassment experiences of young Quebec Francophones and examines the link between sexual harassment and other experiences of victimization. The sample consists of 1186 young adults (577 men and 609 women) aged between 20 and 22 years. In an in-home interview, participants completed computerized questionnaires relating to sexual harassment and other forms of victimization experienced. Results show that 78% of women compared to 61% of men report experiencing at least one episode of sexual harassment from a member of the school or work setting. Sexual harassment in the school setting involves for the majority of cases a fellow student. In the work environment, harassment involves for most cases a colleague. Differences in factors linked to sexual harassment experiences by gender are noted. For men, psychological violence in romantic relationships, witnessing interparental violence and having been victim of child sexual abuse contribute to the prediction of sexual harassment. Only a history of child sexual abuse contributes to the prediction of sexual harassment experiences for women. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".