MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The ultra-low molecular weight heparin (ULMWH) semuloparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: SAVE ONCO study.

2011· article· en· W2249025931 on OpenAlexaff
Giancarlo Agnelli, Dan George, Winfield S. Fisher, A. K. Kakkar, Michael R. Lassen, Patrick Mismetti, Patrick Mouret, Umesh Chaudhari, A. G. G. Turpie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineHazard ratioPulmonary embolismRandomized controlled trialCancerSurgeryLow molecular weight heparinChemotherapyThrombosisConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LBA9014 Background: Patients receiving chemotherapy for cancer are at increased risk for VTE; large randomized controlled trials (RCT) are needed to demonstrate benefit of antithrombotic prophylaxis. Semuloparin is a novel ULMWH with high anti-factor Xa and residual anti-factor IIa activities. We performed a multinational RCT to assess the efficacy and safety of semuloparin for VTE prevention in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy (SAVE-ONCO). Methods: This was a double-blind study in patients with metastatic or locally advanced cancer of lung, colon-rectum, stomach, ovary, pancreas, or bladder, initiating a new chemotherapy course. Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous semuloparin, 20 mg od, or placebo, until change of chemotherapy. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of any symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), non fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) and VTE-related death. Clinically relevant bleeding was the main safety outcome. Outcomes were adjudicated by an independent Committee. Results: Of 3,212 randomized patients, 68% had metastatic cancer; the majority had lung (37%) or colon-rectum (29%) cancer. Median treatment duration was ~3.5 months. Twenty of the 1,608 patients treated with semuloparin (1.2%) and 55 of the 1,604 patients treated with placebo (3.4%) had a thromboembolic event, representing a 64% risk reduction in such event rate (hazard ratio [HR]=0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21–0.60, p<0.0001, intent-to-treat analysis). Treatment effect was consistent for DVT and PE, with a 59% risk reduction in PE rate (odds ratio 0.41, 95%CI 0.19–0.85). No heterogeneity in the benefit was observed for cancer type or stage. Nineteen of 1,589 patients (1.2%) in the semuloparin and 18 of the 1,583 patients (1.1%) in the placebo group had a major bleeding (HR=1.05, 95%CI 0.55 to 1.99). The rate of clinically relevant bleeding was 2.8% with semuloparin vs 2.0% with placebo (HR=1.40, 95%CI 0.89–2.21). Conclusions: We have demonstrated the benefit of thromboprophylaxis with semuloparin in patients receiving chemotherapy without increase in major bleeding. Such patients should be considered for thromboprophylaxis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→