Criteria of Equality of Modal Frequency of Micromechanical Gyroscopes-Accelerometers Sensitive Elements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="zhengwen"><span lang="EN-GB">In this work the topology of the integrated micromechanical sensor of LL-type is developed. Using the condition of equality of modal frequencies of sensitive elements of the micromechanical sensor in both modes along the one axis the criterion of the coincidence is obtained, the criterion of modal frequencies of sensitive elements of the micromechanical sensor in a sense mode along the two axis is obtained, dependences of the ratio of beam length on thickness of a structural layer are showed, the results of numerical simulation of modal frequencies of the micromechanical sensor sensitive element in a drive mode or a sense mode is obtained using the criterion. Using the criterion, it is possible to achieve coincidence of intrinsic vibration frequencies of a sensitive element in a sense mode that provides the same sensitivity to the angular velocities. Coincidence of frequency of forced vibrations in a drive mode with vibration frequencies of a sense mode along both axis of sensitivity can be achieved by using electrostatic elasticity.</span></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".