Nearshore Waves in the Southern Beaufort Sea during Severe Arctic Storms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four major storms ( in 1985, 1993, 1999 and 2000) associated with significant coastal impacts and representing a range of ice conditions are simulated to study wave generation in the nearshore region around the Mackenzie Delta of the southern Beaufort Sea. Simulations are performed using SWAN40.51 under its non-stationary and two-dimensional mode of a fine resolution domain nested with a coarse resolution domain. Wind forcing in the form of a hourly hindcast over the southern Beaufort Sea is provided from the Meteorological Service of Canada Beaufort (MSCB) 21-year wind reanalysis. Bathymetry for the coarse domain is from ETOPO2. A fine resolution bathymetry for the nested domain was generated based primarily on data from Canada Hydrographic Service charts and NRCan field measurements. Moving boundaries of the ice edges are considered in the simulations. Wave attenuation along several transects are examined. Severe eaves are found to be predominantly from the northwest direction. Fully developed seas in the northwest quadrant of the nested region reached maximum wave heights of 4.5 m, 4.6 m and 5.9 m during the storm cases in 1985, 1993 and 1999 respectively. The fetch duirng the 2000 storm was limited by the existence of ice cover and the maximum wave height was 3.1 m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".