Static Recrystallization Characteristic of Low Temperature Rolled AZ31 Magnesium Alloy during Annealing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Microstructure evolution and static recrystallization kinetics of a magnesium AZ31 alloy during annealing have been investigated. The Mg alloy sheets were rolled at 100°C at a low rolling speed of 15m/min and a high rolling speed of 1000m/min to reductions of 8%, 23% and 30%. Annealing was then conducted on the as-rolled specimens at 200°C for different times. The microstructure was characterized by optical microscopy and recrystallization kinetics were evaluated by means of Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) model. The softening behavior was found to be divided into two annealing stages. The first stage was related to the recrystallization on high stored energy regions, such as shear bands and twins, while the second stage was associated to the recrystallization of low stored energy areas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".