MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2250026763

Book Review: Montréal Et L'Eau: Une Histoire Environmentale

2012· article· fr· W2250026763 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jamie Benidickson

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrbanizationReciprocalEnvironmental ethicsNatural (archaeology)Political scienceGeographySociologyEnvironmental planningArchaeologyEconomic growthPhilosophyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book discusses the role of water in the urbanization of Montreal, showing the reciprocal effect of the natural environment and the evolving society. Organized chronologically, the author discusses prominent municipal initiatives and highlights their interconnectedness: the success of one project was directly affected by the effective management of other initiatives. Perceptions of water also evolved. Michele Dagenais's book is a welcome addition to city-centred literature, as it fills a gap by capturing Montreal’s complex and multi-faceted relationship with water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic Journal→Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→