MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2250078330 · doi:10.1109/icdm.2015.70

Two-Step Heterogeneous Finite Mixture Model Clustering for Mining Healthcare Databases

2015· article· en· W2250078330 on OpenAlex
Ahmed Najjar, Christian Gagné, Daniel Reinharz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersInstitute of Genetics
KeywordsCategorical variableMixture modelCluster analysisComputer scienceData miningAnalyticsHidden Markov modelMultinomial distributionData modelingGaussianDatabaseArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dealing with real-life databases often implies handling sets of heterogeneous variables. We are proposing in this paper a methodology for exploring and analyzing such databases, with an application in the specific domain of healthcare data analytics. We are thus proposing a two-step heterogeneous finite mixture model, with a first step involving a joint mixture of Gaussian and multinomial distribution to handle numerical (i.e., real and integer numbers) and categorical variables (i.e., discrete values), and a second step featuring a mixture of hidden Markov models to handle sequences of categorical values (e.g., series of events). This approach is evaluated on a real-world application, the clustering of administrative healthcare databases from Québec, with results illustrating the good performances of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207