MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2250151502 · doi:10.3992/2377-3545-2.1.15

SEASONAL STRATEGIES FOR EVACUATION FROM OFFSHORE STRUCTURES IN THE BEAUFORT SEA

2016· article· en· W2250151502 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Barker, G.W. Timco

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Solutions for Oil Gas and Mining · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRubbleBeaufort seaSubmarine pipelineSea iceBeaufort scaleArctic ice packArcticEnvironmental scienceGeologyMarine engineeringEngineeringOceanographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the results from an integrated research project, carried out over many years, which examined a variety of evacuation strategies for offshore structures in the Beaufort Sea. The objective of the project was to address the safety of offshore personnel working in Canada’s Arctic environment, by examining the issues surrounding emergency evacuation from an offshore structure under the diverse range of conditions in the Beaufort Sea. This was accomplished through: the development of decision flow-charts for the establishment of on-ice evacuation shelters and their associated costs and logistics; field measurements of personnel movement rates across different ice morphologies; an investigation into ice rubble stability and roughness and its influence on evacuation systems; an examination of ice management options when ice rubble is present around an offshore structure; and the presentation of generic means of evacuation and their adequacy for four “seasons” of evacuation: open water, moving pack ice, quasi-stable rubble and stable rubble/landfast ice. The project results provide 1) information related to the viability of systems for a range of realistic ice conditions, especially those involving ice rubble, 2) provide input into the development of the evacuation and rescue options and strategies for Beaufort Sea structures and 3) be used by Operators and Regulators to examine the feasibility of proposed evacuation systems for the Beaufort Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.913
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Solutions for Oil Gas and MiningSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207