MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2250936076 · doi:10.1201/9781003059325-13

Variable-Sized, Circular Bokeh Depth of Field Effects

2020· book-chapter· en· W2250936076 on OpenAlexaff
Johannes Moersch, Howard J. Hamilton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Variable (mathematics)GeologyEnvironmental scienceGeographyMathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose the Flexible Linear-time Area Gather (FLAG) blur algorithm with a variable-sized, circular bokeh for producing depth of field effects on rasterized images. The algorithm is separable (and thus linear). Bokehs can be of any convex shape including circles. The goal is to create a high quality bokeh blur effect by post processing images rendered in real-time by a 3D graphics system. Given only depth and colour information as input, the method performs three passes. The circle of confusion pass calculates the radius of the blur at each pixel and packs the input buffer for the next pass. The horizontal pass samples pixels across each row and outputs a 3D texture packed with blur information. The vertical pass performs a vertical gather on this 3D texture to produce the final blurred image. The time complexity of the algorithm is linear with respect to the maximum radius of the circle of confusion, which compares favorably with the naive algorithm, which is quadratic. The space complexity is linear with respect to the maximum radius of the circle of confusion. The results of our experiments show that the algorithm generates high quality blurred images with variable-sized circular bokehs. The implemented version of the proposed algorithm is consistently faster in practice than the implemented naive algorithm. Although some previous algorithms have provided linear performance scaling and variable sized bokehs, the proposed algorithm provides these while also permitting more flexibility in the allowed blur shapes, including any convex shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207