MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2251729651

Икона «Спас Эммануил» из собрания ГИМ — микромозаика раннепалеологовской эпохи

2013· article· ru· W2251729651 on OpenAlex
M. Iakovleva

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueКонференция Актуальные проблемы теории и истории искусства · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIconByzantine architectureStyle (visual arts)Context (archaeology)ParallelsObject (grammar)Quarter (Canadian coin)Order (exchange)HistoryArtVisual artsClassicsComputer scienceEngineeringArchaeologyArtificial intelligenceBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is concerned with the micromosaic icon of Christ Emmanuel from the State Historical Museum in Moscow. The study deals with the style of icon and considers the new material for stylistic comparisons, in order to specify the place of the object in the context of Early Palaiologan art. The article covers an issue of parallels with other Byzantine micromosaics, which were created at the end of 13th– first quarter of 14th c. Academic significance of the study is emphasized by the lack of researches dedicated to this precious icon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0880.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it