MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W225174740

Lara Campbell, Dominique Clement, and Gregory S. Kealey, Eds. Debating Dissent: Canada and the Sixties

2014· article· en· W225174740 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nelson Wiseman

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissentCounterculturePower (physics)HistoryMedia studiesSociologyGender studiesHumanitiesReligious studiesArt historyPolitical sciencePoliticsArtLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lara Campbell, Dominique Clement, and Gregory S. Kealey, eds. Debating Dissent: Canada and Sixties. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012. 374 pp. Notes. Index. $29.95 sc. We are now as distant from 1960s as that decade was from First World War, but past is always present. Indisputably, tumultuous 1960s were culturally transformative. In trope of Debating Dissent, the were more than a decade; they were an idea and a phenomenon that transcended a fixed period. They expressed temperaments that went against grain of conventional wisdom, challenging nostrums of established authority and refusing to defer. This collection of 13 essays with an introduction by two of editors is latest book in Canadian Social History Series under general editorship of labour historian Gregory S. Kealey. The contributors do not so much debate as they document dissent. Some of authors lived through events they dissect (although some veterans of drug-induced flower power counterculture claim that if you can remember Sixties, you were not there). The younger authors are intrigued by era's permissiveness; Sixties spawned much of contemporary academic discourse in which they engage on subjects such as environment, Aboriginals, race, and gender. Some of chapters are case studies--the 1969 and 1971 riots at Sir George Williams (now Concordia) University and Vancouver's Gastown, and confrontations involving Blacks in Nova Scotia. Other chapters offer broader surveys --of wildcat strikes, English Canadian and Quebec nationalisms, drug culture, women's movement, and rise of faculty power at universities. This last story, stretching for two decades beginning in early 1950s, speaks to elasticity of Sixties as an epoch. So too do photographs that preface each chapter. Of 13 images, five are from either 1950s or 1970s. The cover illustration of a longhaired protester forcibly thrown into a paddy wagon by police officers has two children relaxing on street curb less than five feet away, their attention directed elsewhere. Students of ethnicity will find thin gruel in these studies. Unless their interest is Canada's Blacks (West Indian and Nova Scotian), Aboriginals, or Quebecois, they will encounter only a gratuitous mention of Jewishness of an American draft dodger and a brief reference to assistance extended to Halifax's Africville residents by Jewish Labour Committee. I would have welcomed a chapter that detailed rise of multicultural discourse, triggered by hearings of Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism. What was termed third force in Canada spoke out. Largely located in western Canada, it was composed mainly of second--and third-generation Europeans who considered their cultural heritages denigrated by assumptive title of Commission. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207