MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2251827126 · doi:10.14740/wjnu227w

Atypical Pleural Effusions in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

2015· article· en· W2251827126 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hari Wimaleswaran, Stella Setyapranata, Paul Champion de Crespigny, S. Holt

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Nephrology and Urology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHydrothoraxPleural effusionSurgeryPeritoneal dialysisEffusionDialysisHeart failureInternal medicineAscites

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rarely, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is complicated by a hydrothorax, often referred to as a pleural effusion, that commonly occurs early after starting PD and is usually right-sided. We illustrate three cases of atypical hydrothorax presenting in PD patients. Case 1 is a 72-year-old lady with left-sided pleuroperitoneal communication confirmed on nuclear imaging. Case 2 is a 50-year-old lady who presented with right-sided pleuroperitoneal leak which occurred 11 months after commencement of PD. The last case is a 64-year-old man with congestive cardiac failure secondary to ischemic heart disease who had recurrent right-sided pleural effusion despite multiple pleural drainage. He continued on PD with no drainage problems. Pleuroperitoneal leaks need to be excluded even in patients presenting with left-sided effusion and in those who present late after commencement of PD. World J Nephrol Urol. 2015;4(4):256-259 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu227w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Nephrology and UrologySame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207