Carbonic anhydrase inhibition delays plasma lactate appearance with no effect on ventilatory threshold
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of carbonic anhydrase (CA) inhibition with acetazolamide (Acz, 10 mg/kg body wt iv) on exercise performance and the ventilatory (VET) and lactate (LaT) thresholds was studied in seven men during ramp exercise (25 W/min) to exhaustion. Breath-by-breath measurements of gas exchange were obtained. Arterialized venous blood was sampled from a dorsal hand vein and analyzed for plasma pH, PCO(2), and lactate concentration ([La(-)](pl)). VET [expressed as O(2) uptake (VO(2)), ml/min] was determined using the V-slope method. LaT (expressed as VO(2), ml/min) was determined from the work rate (WR) at which [La(-)](pl) increased 1.0 mM above rest levels. Peak WR was higher in control (Con) than in Acz sutdies [339 +/- 14 vs. 315 +/- 14 (SE) W]. Submaximal exercise VO(2) was similar in Acz and Con; the lower VO(2) at exhaustion in Acz than in Con (3.824 +/- 0. 150 vs. 4.283 +/- 0.148 l/min) was appropriate for the lower WR. CO(2) output (VCO(2)) was lower in Acz than in Con at exercise intensities >/=125 W and at exhaustion (4.375 +/- 0.158 vs. 5.235 +/- 0.148 l/min). [La(-)](pl) was lower in Acz than in Con during submaximal exercise >/=150 W and at exhaustion (7.5 +/- 1.1 vs. 11.5 +/- 1.1 mmol/l). VET was similar in Acz and Con (2.483 +/- 0.086 and 2.362 +/- 0.110 l/min, respectively), whereas the LaT occurred at a higher VO(2) in Acz than in Con (2.738 +/- 0.223 vs. 2.190 +/- 0.235 l/min). CA inhibition with Acz is associated with impaired elimination of CO(2) during the non-steady-state condition of ramp exercise. The similarity in VET in Con and Acz suggests that La(-) production is similar between conditions but La(-) appearance in plasma is reduced and/or La(-) uptake by other tissues is enhanced after the Acz treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".