MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2251989420

Towards a Hybrid Rule-based and Statistical Arabic-French Machine Translation System

2013· article· en· W2251989420 on OpenAlexaff
Fatiha Sadat

Bibliographic record

VenueRecent Advances in Natural Language Processing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachine translationComputer scienceNatural language processingArtificial intelligencePhraseArabicMachine translation software usabilityExample-based machine translationRule-based machine translationEvaluation of machine translationTransfer-based machine translationComputer-assisted translationTranslation (biology)Synchronous context-free grammarScheme (mathematics)BLEUModern Standard ArabicQuality (philosophy)Linguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arabic is a morphologically rich and complex language, which presents significant challenges for natural language processing and machine translation. In this paper, we describe an ongoing effort to build our first Arabic-French phrase‐ based machine translation system using the Moses decoder among other linguistic tools. The results show an improvement in the quality of translation and a gain in terms of Bleu score after introducing a pre-processing scheme for Arabic and applying some rules based on morphological variations of the source language. The proposed approach is completed without increasing the amount of training data or changing radically the algorithms that can affect the translation or training engines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecent Advances in Natural Language ProcessingSame topicNatural Language Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207