MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2252638482 · doi:10.13031/trans.57.10125

Comparing Two Statistical Discriminant Models with a Back-Propagation Neural Network Model for Pairwise Classification of Location and Crop Year Specific Wheat Classes at Three Selected Moisture Contents Using NIR Hyperspectral Images

2014· article· en· W2252638482 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Mahesh Sivakumar, Digvir S. Jayas, Jitendra Paliwal, N. D. G. White

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the ASABE · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsPrincipal component analysisHyperspectral imagingMoistureMathematicsLinear discriminant analysisBackpropagationPairwise comparisonArtificial neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceStatisticsRemote sensingGeographyComputer scienceMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<abstract><title><italic>Abstract.</italic></title> Knowledge of wheat classes and seed moisture contents not only determines the end use of wheat flour but also helps in developing effective storage systems for wheat. Samples of four classes of wheat, including Canada Western Red Spring (CWRS), Canada Western Hard White Spring (CWHWS), Canada Western Soft White Spring (CWSWS), and Canada Prairie Spring Red (CPSR), were obtained from at least five different locations for each class in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta for the 2007, 2008, and 2009 crop years and conditioned to moisture contents of 13%, 16%, and 19%. Near-infrared (NIR) hyperspectral images were acquired from bulk samples in the 960-1700 nm wavelength region at 10 nm intervals. The first and second principal component score images were compared for the segmented images of all wheat classes. Pairwise wheat class identification was done using a non-parametric statistical model and a four-layer back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model. The NIR wavelengths of 1260 to 1380 nm had the highest factor loadings for the first principal component using principal component analysis (PCA). The four-layer BPNN model was used for two-class identification of wheat classes. Overall average pairwise classification accuracies of 83.7% were obtained for discriminating wheat samples based on their moisture contents. Average classification accuracies of 83.2%, 75.4%, and 73.1%, were obtained for identifying wheat classes for samples with 13%, 16%, and 19% moisture content (m.c.), respectively. In this study, discriminant models yielded better classification accuracies than BPNN models. Overall average classification accuracies of wheat classes using statistical models were 80.6% for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and 76.3% for the quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA). This work showed that NIR hyperspectral imaging can be used as a potential nondestructive tool for classifying moisture-specific wheat classes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the ASABESame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207