MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Formation of Methane Clathrate Hydrates in Coal Moisture: Implications for Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Pressures

2015· article· en· W2252988793 on OpenAlexafffundabout
A. M. M. Bustin, R.M. Bustin, Igor L. Moudrakovskim, Satoshi Takeya, John A. Ripmeester

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaSteacie Institute for Molecular SciencesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCoalMethaneMoistureCoalbed methaneClathrate hydrateVolume (thermodynamics)Water contentSorptionChemistryAdsorptionBituminous coalPermafrostMineralogyCoal miningGeologyHydratePetroleum engineeringOrganic chemistryGeotechnical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adsorption, X-ray diffraction, and nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of subbituminous to high-volatile bituminous coal at in situ moisture content, low temperatures, and moderate pressures demonstrate that a significant proportion of the inherent moisture (nonmobile water) is available to form methane clathrate hydrates. These results have implications for coal gas resources and reservoir pressures in current areas of permafrost and the much larger regions that were glaciated during the Pleistocene. Methane adsorption tests indicate the clathrates form comparatively rapidly in coal micro- and mesopores from an immobile water phase, at lower pressures than those formed in macroporous materials. At successively higher experimental pressures, hydrates nucleate and grow rapidly on the scale of minutes to hours, until an “apparent” equilibrium pressure is reached. The onset of hydrate formation at 0 °C is at about 3.25 MPa for a Tarn coal with 33% moisture and at slightly higher pressures for the other coals with lower inherent moisture. The amount of gas consumed in hydrate formation, in excess of that attributed to sorption, is 11.6 cm 3 /g coal for the Tarn coal (Alaska) with 33% moisture, 8.15 cm 3 /g coal for a Dietz coal (Wyoming) with 22% moisture, and 1.85 cm 3 /g coal for a Texas coal with about 8% moisture. On a volume of gas (STP) per volume of water basis at 8 MPa, the Tarn and Dietz coal have similar values (35 and 37 cm 3 /cm 3 ), whereas the Texas coal is measureably less (24 cm 3 /cm 3 ). At 8 MPa and 0 °C, about 20% of the inherent moisture has participated in hydrate formation for the Tarn and Deitz coals and 13% for the Texas coal. If hydrate formation strips methane from the sorbed state, the proportion of water contributing to hydrate calculates was over 100% for the Texas coal, which suggests that methane is mainly forming from free gas. The methane hydrates analyzed by X-ray diffraction and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy are cubic ( Pm 3 n̅ space group) and have small and large cage sI structures. NMR and PXRD spectra indicates that the small cages are about 90% occupied, while the large cages are completely full, yielding a stoichiometry of ca. CH 4 ·6H 2 O, which is consistent with other natural hydrates. There is some evidence that some methane gas remains trapped in the smallest pores, whereas the hydrates occupy large pores, which may be due to the suppression of hydrate formation by high capillary pressures. The formation of methane hydrates, particularly in low-rank coals, markedly increases the capacity of the coal to store gas. Depending on the coal moisture content and coal rank, methane storage capacity in gas hydrates is up to 2 orders of magnitude greater than the gas storage capacity of the coal by sorption alone. Since low-rank coals invariably have high moisture content, if the strata lie with the hydrate stability zone, significant gas storage in hydrates is anticipated, if gas is available. At the low temperature required for hydrate formation, however, self-sourced methane from methanogenesis or thermal alteration is not anticipated. Successive formation and dissociation of methane hydrates during glacial and interglacial times in the Pleistocene can be anticipated to have impacted shallow gas reservoirs, including coals, to depth up to about 800 m, depending on the surface temperature and geothermal gradient. It is speculated that during the Pleistocene free and sorbed coal gas was scavenged during the formation of hydrates, and this process may explain the low gas content of some high-latitude coals. Similarly, lower than anticipated pore pressure and lack of free water in the Horseshoe Canyon coals in western Canada may be the result of dissociation of hydrates forming overpressures, which potentially could hydraulically fracture the coal and flush the coal of free water. Subsequent dissipation of the gas pressure would lead to the current low reservoir pressure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicMethane Hydrates and Related PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207