Neurohumoral System is the Main Pathway for Transmitting Acupuncture and Moxibustion Information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abundant nerve ending distribution in the acupoint: Anatomists from 10 medical colleges and institutes as Shanghai Medical University, etc observed that there existed abundant nerve endings within about 5 mm-diameter range of the acupoint area in majority of 2444 acupoints in the dead human body. In above 90% of the observed acupoints, there were some nerve trunks or nerve branches to pass through. Results of the observations on 371 acupoints by scholars from France, Japan, Canada, the former Soviet Union, etc was very similar to those of Chinese scholars. The relationship between acupoint locations and forms of nerve distribution are ① acupoints are located in the superficial layer of the muscles where the nerves go out from the deep part. Most of them are acupoints on the head； ② the distribution of majority of the acupoints along the meridian track is basically identical to the route running of nerve trunk； ③ some acupoints are located at the converging sites of the cutaneous nerve branches on the bilateral sides of the midline of the body trunk; and ④ some acupoints distribute in the nerve branches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".